[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: US consumer purchase of international editions
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: US consumer purchase of international editions
- From: "Aline Soules" <aline.soules@csueastbay.edu>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:50:50 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
As an addendum to the issue of bringing books from one country to another, I can attest to the fact that if you are sending a book to Canada from the United States, it may not get there. I'm not talking about anything that might be constituted "obscene" or controversial in some other way, but I can't even have the New Yorker send a desk diary to a friend in Canada (my annual present to her). It's sent back as not acceptable by customs. As a result, I have to find a "work-around" to get it to her. I've also had other experiences of sending perfectly innocuous books to Canada and having them rejected by customs as "not acceptable" books. I find this ironic in light of the exchange of drugs between the countries. There must be some bureaucratic rationales behind these decisions/behaviors, but I've never been able to figure them out. Aline Soules Cal State East Bay Aline.soules@csueastbay.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Jean-Claude Guedon Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 5:19 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: US consumer purchase of international editions Market segmentation by region of the world has nothing to do with copyright. it has all to do with extracting maximum profit from each market by playing on the total "price x #sales". It is the same strategy with the zones for DVD's and just as reprehensible. it also works for drugs, and there is is downright abominable (remember US elders coming to Canada to buy drugs at about half the price of US prices a few years back).. Nothing in copyright law says anything about marketing strategies. It speaks to modalities of property when applied to documents (in the widest sense) of all kinds, and only to that. Moreover, and so far as I know, no country has any law capable of stopping a book from being introduced in a country even if the cover says "not for resale in x, y and z. I am not talking about books banned for whatever reasons here. Division of world markets between various distributors is based on contracts. It is implemented through contract laws, not copyright. In any case, at the individual level, the first sale doctrine allows me to resell a book from somewhere to be sold again in the US or elsewhere. What I would hope for is that students should quickly organize (within the limits of the law) ways to bring in these cheaper volumes in their country and thus save a lot of money to their colleagues, perhaps make a little bit of money themselves, and expose one of the most despicable strategies of multinationals. Or better still, students should get involved in the OER movement (open educational resources). Jean-Claude Guedon Le mercredi 23 septembre 2009 a 21:02 -0400, Joseph Esposito a ecrit : > Oh, agree entirely with the diagnosis. It's the remedy that > eludes me. > > Arbitration is growing. A couple undergraduates a few years ago > at UCSD starting purchasing English-language science texts in > China (with Chinese-language covers) and reselling them to their > classmates. Undergraduates. I can only see this situation > worsening (or improving, depending on your point of view). > > Copyright is screwy. Even people who defend it, as I do, know it > is screwy. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: PLOS article metrics
- Next by Date: Re: UOW's open access research repository reaches one million downloads
- Previous by thread: Re: US consumer purchase of international editions
- Next by thread: Re: US consumer purchase of international editions
- Index(es):