[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Multi-Site licensing language
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Multi-Site licensing language
- From: "Ingrassia, Barbara" <Barbara.Ingrassia@umassmed.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:52:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Hello, I would like to revive this conversation, please. We are a "stand-alone medical school" ---with one campus, one IP range, one administration. Our students and faculty also work in our clinical partner--which has hospitals in multiple towns--including one on the school campus. The clinical system has one IP range and a central admin. (Of course the individual hospitals also have local admin.) Naturally, we work very closely together and depend on each other. We do a lot of goal-setting together; the higher administrators of both the school and clinical are presently housed in the school building so that they can work closely together. A few service functions for both are carried out by one office. The "official addresses" of the school and the clinical system are not the same. The 2 IP ranges are not the same. We are getting push-back from pubs to our tradition/practice of several years of being licensed as a single site. Whereas in the past we submitted FTE of students and faculty, now we are often being asked to submit employee numbers for the entire clinical system. What is your advice, please? Thank you very much! Barbara Ingrassia UMass Medical School -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris (Morris Associates) Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 11:52 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Multi-Site licensing language I've always thought it more useful to think in terms of licensing a network, rather than a physical place. Indeed, this wording was used in the first industry 'model license' I worked on. Sally Morris Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Julie Blake Sent: 04 April 2009 03:29 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Multi-Site licensing language Georgie, This definition seems to be up to each individual publisher/licensor. We try to get away from defining "site" at all, and try to stick with "authorized users" instead. We'll say something like, "we want to license this for all of our faculty, staff, students, researchers, walk-ins and alumni no matter where they are" and go from there. Many publishers still think of a site as any place that would have had a separate print subscription. Julie C. Blake Acquisitions Coordinator Sheridan Libraries Johns Hopkins University julie.blake@jhu.edu
- Prev by Date: BioOne Announces 2010 Collections
- Previous by thread: BioOne Announces 2010 Collections
- Index(es):