[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- From: "Sally Morris \(Morris Associates\)" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:47:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
One reason why using the link, rather than printing out multiple copies, could matter is that the usage statistics would thus indicate (to both the publisher and the institution) the true level of usage. This could be important when it comes to renewal/cancellation decisions Sally Morris Partner, Morris Associates - Publishing Consultancy South House, The Street Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of claudia holland Sent: 21 August 2009 21:39 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use But only authorized users can access database content, per the license agreement. And only registered students in a class can access content in e-reserves and a CMS, like Blackboard. If the university already pays for this content, then we should not be requested (or required) to pay for it twice. Granted the link to the article and not a pdf should be included in the prof?s Blackboard account (although in the long run, why does it matter). That requires the student to be authenticated through the proxy server, as well as become familiar with that database. I recently was told that even if we purchased electronic access to a particular journal, the publisher would require us to pay copyright royalties if articles from that journal were posted in an electronic reserves account. I think not. No library would agree to this license language. Claudia Holland Sandy Thatcher wrote: > If the library subscribes to journals in electronic form and > teachers provide URLs to the content paid for, publishers have > no objections. When libraries turn into subsidiary printing > operations and create many more copies of articles than they > purchased through subscription, that indeed exceeds what they > paid for and interferes with the market for the publishers? > products. > > Sanford G. Thatcher > Executive Editor for Social Sciences and Humanities > Penn State University Press
- Prev by Date: Re: UC Academics Raise Major Concerns About Google Settlement
- Next by Date: Re: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- Previous by thread: Re: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- Next by thread: Re: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- Index(es):