[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- From: <Toby.GREEN@oecd.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:30:55 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Doesn't it rather depend on what the publisher has sold in the first place? In our case, we allow (indeed encourage), educators to use subscribed material in course packs because we work on the principle that we have sold subscribers the content on the basis of unlimited use - and that means course packs and any other use within the institution. If libraries want to become subsidiary printing operations - that's fine by us. (The only thing we ask is that subscribers do not re-sell our content to third parties.) Toby Green Head of Publishing Public Affairs & Communications Directorate OECD toby.green@oecd.org www.oecd.org/publishing -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sandy Thatcher Sent: 18 August, 2009 11:10 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use If the library subscribes to journals in electronic form and teachers provide URLs to the content paid for, publishers have no objections. When libraries turn into subsidiary printing operations and create many more copies of articles than they purchased through subscription, that indeed exceeds what they paid for and interferes with the market for the publishers' products. Sanford G. Thatcher Executive Editor for Social Sciences and Humanities Penn State University Press >I'll probably show my ignorance of the publishing world here, but >here goes anyway... > >Sandy says that"income streams must be generated to pay the costs >[of peer review]. These streams include charges for use of >massive amounts of materials in course packs and e-reserve >systems like Georgia State's." > >I understand the need for revenue streams to support the peer >revue process. But in cases where a library already subscribes to >the journals in question, isn't that sort of double-charging? An >institution pays for a subscription to a given journal, and then >pays again to use pieces of the same journal in electronic course >packs and e-reserves? > >Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- Next by Date: Re: Do academic journals pose a threat to the advancement of scien=
- Previous by thread: RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- Next by thread: RE: Scholarly communication, copyright, and fair use
- Index(es):