[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Privacy and the Google settlement (long, sorry)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Privacy and the Google settlement (long, sorry)
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:02:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Baby and the bath water. Privacy is a very big issue, and I hope we find a way to deal with this, and find it soon. But there is a difference between personal information and information on user behavior that can be used to assess product features, which in turn can be fed back into the product development cycle. Disclosing all information is repugnant, disclosing no information give us no chance to learn and grow. Joe Esposito -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Hellman Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 6:14 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Privacy and the Google settlement (long, sorry) It seems to me that through the use of technological measures such as implementing proxy servers, libraries could go a long way towards protecting patron privacy with respect to Google Books, settlement agreement or no settlement agreement. Time to put up or shut up? I've written up a summary of Tuesday's panel at the New York Public Library at http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-books-settlement-agreement- panel.html Eric Hellman President, Gluejar, Inc. Montclair, NJ 07042 eric@hellman.net http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/
- Prev by Date: New Journals to remain Freely Available in 2010 for libraries which Opt-in
- Next by Date: On Google Books Intermediaries & Pricing
- Previous by thread: New Journals to remain Freely Available in 2010 for libraries which Opt-in
- Next by thread: On Google Books Intermediaries & Pricing
- Index(es):