[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: "Overlay Journals" Over Again...)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: "Overlay Journals" Over Again...)
- From: Mary Summerfield <msummerfield@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 23:39:39 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
SPIE reviewed the business model for journals in our fields and found that none of the many we checked had submission fees. I believe that such fees are a good idea fundamentally but only if you have the very best journals in a field can a publisher take the risk of introducing them in a field. I know that some of the top journals in economics use them. Mary Summerfield ________________________________ From: Ivy Anderson <Ivy.Anderson@ucop.edu> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2009 8:08:21 PM Subject: Submission Fees (was: RE: "Overlay Journals" Over Again...) The idea of submission fees is one that we at the California Digital Library have also repeatedly attempted to advance in recent years. Publishers frequently cite the steep rise in submissions as a factor affecting their cost structure. It makes no sense that this activity is entirely subsidized by other players in the publication chain. Some recent modeling that we have done at CDL - admittedly based on rough and preliminary figures from a variety of sources - suggests that even very modest submission fees, if implemented by publishes across the board, would come close to completely covering the systemic cost increases associated with the steady increase in publishing output overall (another factor to which annual price rises for journals are frequently attributed by some analysts). If anyone has studied this - i.e. the potential contribution that submission fees would make to the cost of the scholarly publishing system as a whole - with any rigor, I would be very interested to see those data. It's easy to understand how the current incentive system works against this: what publisher will voluntarily disadvantage itself in attracting submissions by imposing such fees if its competitors do not? Nonetheless, as library budgets continue to contract, the survival of scholarly publishing may just depend on finding ways to distribute costs across a wider base. Submission fees - even if modest ones - should be on the table. Ivy Anderson Director of Collections California Digital Library University of California, Office of the President ivy.anderson@ucop.edu http://cdlib.org
- Prev by Date: Scholarly Communications Interest Group Meeting at ALA
- Next by Date: July issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Previous by thread: RE: Submission Fees (was: RE: "Overlay Journals" Over Again...)
- Next by thread: Re: Submission Fees (was: RE: "Overlay Journals" Over Again...)
- Index(es):