[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Article on arXiv
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Article on arXiv
- From: Keith Seitter <kseitter@ametsoc.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:43:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
David, The FAQ page for the new MIT open access policy has the following entry: -- *Will this policy harm journals, scholarly societies, small friendly publishers, or peer review? *There is no empirical evidence that even when all articles are freely available, journals are canceled. The major societies in physics have not seen any impact on their publishing programs despite the fact that for more than 10 years an open access repository (arXiv) containing nearly all of the physics literature written in that time has been available and successful. If there is downward pressure on journal prices over time, publishers with the most inflated prices -- which tend to be the commercial publishers -- will feel the effects sooner. Journals will still be needed for their value-added services, such as peer review logistics, copy editing, type setting, and maintaining web sites. -- You can find this at the following Web site: http://info-libraries.mit.edu/scholarly/faculty-and-researchers/mit-faculty-open-access-policy/oapolicyprocedures/oa-policy-faq/#harmpub Keith Seitter Executive Director American Meteorological Society __________________________________ David Prosser wrote: > Could somebody please let me know when the last time was they heard anybody > (informed or otherwise) say: > > 'everything published in physics can be found in the arXiv' > > Thanks > > David
- Prev by Date: RE: OASPA welcomes Phil Davis's exercise
- Next by Date: Re: Article on arXiv
- Previous by thread: Re: Article on arXiv
- Next by thread: Re: Article on arXiv
- Index(es):