[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Building collections at all
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Building collections at all
- From: Bill Cohen <bcohen7719@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:27:17 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Rick's most insightful overview and intriguing project points to possible, future "on demand/just-in-time" library services. - Bill Rick Anderson wrote: >> collection-building in these very difficult times and have been >> struck by the fact that there is little discussion of testing >> on-demand services. >> > > Joe, there is a actually quite a lot of discussion going on in > the library world around this issue, and experiments are in fact > being conducted. Greg and Scott have both alluded to some of > them. At my institution we're in the second phase of a fairly > large-scale experiment with on-demand ebook purchasing using a > system whereby many ebook records are loaded into our catalog and > only those that are actually used by patrons get purchased and > added to our permanent collection -- records for the unused > titles eventually disappear. A good number of other research > libraries are conducting similar tests. We're also looking very > seriously at purchasing an Espresso Book Machine, which would > allow us to print and bind books on demand -- selling them to > patrons where ownership is desired, and adding them to our > collections (with exceptions) where it isn't. (Given our > relatively poor track record at guessing what people will want, > demonstrated patron interest in a particular title seems like as > good a collecting criterion as any.) > > Here's the really radical question, though: why are most of us > building permanent collections at all anymore? As Greg pointed > out, in very many cases we can now respond to patrons' expressed > needs quickly enough that buying speculatively seems like a poor > use of money -- especially in the current budget environment. > It's already kind of silly for patrons to use our catalogs as > discovery tools, since any library's collection represents only a > tiny fraction of the material that is actually available on any > given topic. Since our patrons tend now to be searching through > a much larger segment of the information universe than we could > ever hope to collect ahead of time, why don't we focus on fast > fulfillment rather than wasting money on stuff no one wants? > > Rick Anderson > Assoc. Dir. For Scholarly Resources & Collections > Marriott Library > Univ. of Utah > rick.anderson@utah.edu > -- Bill Cohen, /Publisher / *The Haworth Press* www.informaworld.com [Taylor & Francis Group]
- Prev by Date: Publishing standards -More on Elsevier/Merck
- Next by Date: Re: Building collections at all
- Previous by thread: Publishing standards -More on Elsevier/Merck
- Next by thread: Re: Building collections at all
- Index(es):