[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- From: "Chen, Xiaotian" <chen@bumail.bradley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:34:01 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This story should be more of an OA problem than a peer-review problem. According to the original LJ story, the journal "claims to enforce peer-review." The model of author paying for OA publication may have contributed to this, while common sense tells us that traditional model (customers pay) may work better for quality control. Xiaotian Chen Bradley U Library Peoria, Illinois http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~chen/index.html
- Prev by Date: Hoax article update
- Next by Date: Joint MLA/AAHSL statement on Journal Publishing Ethics
- Previous by thread: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Next by thread: Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
- Index(es):