[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OASPA responds to submission prank in OA journal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: OASPA responds to submission prank in OA journal
- From: "David Prosser" <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:18:19 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If Mr Mahmood Alam wishes to re-read the OASPA blog item he will see that at no point is it suggested that the paper was published. It was apparently accepted for publication in a journal published by Bentham Science before the author, Phil Davis, withdrew it. But as Mr Alam is monitoring this discussion, perhaps he can enlighten us as to the more serious issues at question. Was this paper peer-reviewed before acceptance? By how many people? Were these reviewers external to Bentham or part of Bentham staff? What, if any, action is Bentham taking to improve its reviewing procedures? Speaking as an OASPA Board member, it was never the intention to tarnish Phil Davis' whistleblowing abilities and if words such as 'spoof' or 'hoax' are preferred to 'prank' then I can't imagine anybody at OASPA objecting. David Director, SPARC Europe Tel: +44 (0) 1865 277 614 Mobile: +44 (0) 7974 673 888 Web: www.sparceurope.org -----Original Message----- From: mhej@cyber.net.pk To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: OASPA responds to submission prank in OA journal Attn: Dr. Caroline Sutton Dear Dr. Sutton I refer to your following message. Please note that this is not correct that Bentham Science Publishers has published any such article. With regards, Sincerely, Mahmood Alam Director (Publications) Bentham Science Publishers > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Caroline Sutton > Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 8:24 AM > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: OASPA responds to submission prank in OA journal > > The Open Access Scholarly Publisher's Association (OASPA) has > responded to the recent prank involving the submission - and > reported acceptance - of a computer-generated paper to The Open > Information Science Journal, published by Bentham Science. > > As noted in the blog piece, one of the key incentives behind > establishing OASPA was a desire to ensure high standards among > Open Access publishers. > > The blog piece is available at: > http://oaspa.org/blog/2009/06/11/publishing-ethics-open-access-and-oaspa/ > > Caroline Sutton, PhD > Publisher > Co-Action Publishing > tel/skype: +46 (0)18 495 1126 > mob: +47 90 69 05 06 > www.co-action.net
- Prev by Date: Re: OASPA responds to submission prank in OA journal
- Next by Date: Hoax article update
- Previous by thread: Re: OASPA responds to submission prank in OA journal
- Next by thread: The Argument Against (Premature) Gold OA Support
- Index(es):