[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
- From: bgsloan2@yahoo.com
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:09:16 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Robert Richards said: "Moreover, often the dissemination of ideas in these new media becomes an end in itself: for example, many an influential scholarly blog post never leads to a formally published scholarly work." That reminds me of an experience I had. Once I was playing around with some data comparing citations on the web to citations in the Web of Science. It was very preliminary stuff. I put a very brief description of the results on a web page. This web page wound up being cited seven times in the Web of Science: twice in JASIST, twice in the Journal of Information Science, twice in Online Information Review, and once in College and Research Libraries. I have had some formally published papers that have only been cited once or twice in WoS. Bernie Sloan Sora Associates
- Prev by Date: Metadata and Nature Group
- Next by Date: ALCTS webinar on institutional repositories (June 10)
- Previous by thread: Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
- Next by thread: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Index(es):