[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- From: "Chen, Xiaotian" <chen@bumail.bradley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 23:59:10 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There is probably no disagreement among librarians that the restriction on E articles ILL needs to go away. But some probably do not care any more, since fewer and fewer libraries are cataloging E journals while the percentage of E journals is skyrocketing. Even among those still catalog their E journals, not all report to OCLC. As a result, libraries no longer have as good knowledge as before on who owns which journal. Xiaotian Chen Bradley University Library Peoria, Illinois From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of B.G. Sloan Sent: Fri 5/22/2009 9:45 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL I gotta agree with Ivy Anderson's take on this . . . disincentives to electronic ILL make the lending institution's job harder, but that is certainly not a disincentive to the borrower asking for an article. Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
- Next by Date: The Future of the Scholarly Monograph
- Previous by thread: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Next by thread: The Big Deal/Seven ARL Libraries Face Major Planned or Potential Budget Cuts
- Index(es):