[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned

To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 22:26:31 EDT
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

Anthony Watkinson writes

> We are concerned with examining the odd fact that the traditional
> form of formal scholarly communications (monographs and in
> particular and mainly journal articles) are still much the same in
> spite of significant changes in scholarly work flows.

Are there significant changes? From the academics' point of view 
they are still producing "papers" for print media, aren't they?

Cheers,

Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                               RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
                                              skype: thomaskrichel

Prev by Date: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
Next by Date: Knowledge is for all - comment on joint IFLA / IPC Statement
Previous by thread: Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
Next by thread: Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread