[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- From: "Raewyn Adams" <Raewyn.Adams@bopdhb.govt.nz>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:11:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
My understanding was always that the licence restriction is about the vendor's fear that a 'live' PDF will be edited on its way through the systems and therefore the vendor could be held responsible for changes they did not make, but can't prove otherwise. Or something like that. I believe if the licence says 'no electronic transmission' we have to abide by that for the electronic sourced copies. But a printed journal article can always be scanned to PDF and sent. And I think the printing of an online-sourced PDF and then re-scanning it is probably OK from a 'safety' perspective, but if the licence doesn't say you can then there could be a problem. If you are printing to PDF using software that doesn't OCR what it is printing, then that should also be safe, but would still be grey. And if your printing to PDF was doing OCR at he same time, then you are back to square one with the vendor's fear that the text might be altered somewhere. Does that make sense? I have always felt that the licence wording is out of date for today's needs, but I guess the vendors pay their lawyers to set it up without any understanding of library systems, and then it stays the same forever regardless of the fact that in the meantime the world has changed. Cheers Raewyn Raewyn Adams Librarian Tauranga Hospital Library Bay of Plenty District Health Board 840 Cameron Rd Tauranga South 3112 NZ
- Prev by Date: American Math Society announces price freeze for 2010
- Next by Date: Duke University Press announces 2010 pricing
- Previous by thread: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Next by thread: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Index(es):