[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- From: "Ivy Anderson" <Ivy.Anderson@ucop.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 22:20:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The California Digital Library's standard license agreement also includes electronic ILL by default - our provision is similar to NELLCO's. We have been successful in many instances - the number of publishers who are prepared to 'go green' is happily increasing. However there is still more work to do on this front. This remains a key issue for our interlibrary loan departments. Prohibitions against electronic ILL do not discourage interlibrary lending (the primary reason that publishers give for this anachronistic restriction) because the burden affects the lender, not the borrower. It's the CONTU provisions that serve as a brake against ILL as a replacement for subscription. Worries about articles flying around the globe are also unfounded because there are already ample avenues for this to happen compared with which ILL is hardly noticeable. Rather, publishers should consider that such policies affect our subscription decisions when difficult choices need to be made and that the more costly it is for libraries to fulfill their interlibrary-lending responsibilities, the less money we will have for subscriptions in these challenging times. We encourage all publishers who are listening to join us in going green! Ivy Anderson Director of Collections California Digital Library University of California, Office of the President
- Prev by Date: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Next by Date: Re: Merck published fake journal
- Previous by thread: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Next by thread: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
- Index(es):