[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merck published fake journal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Merck published fake journal
- From: "Elizabeth E. Kirk" <elizabeth.e.kirk@Dartmouth.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:09:11 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
With all due repect, it's not that black and white. Please don't forget that non-profits--including NP publishing and almost all libraries--are "managed", to use your words, by people who are not owners. We work to fulfill a mission and our work is overseen by boards whose job it is to make sure that we stay on course. Publicly held companies report to boards, as well. The questions are 1) whether the board is doing its job and 2) if "the business of the firm" (to quote Drucker's famous line) is to create profit through trustworthy products and practices or to grab every dollar, euro, yuan, etc. by any means possible. Is it safe to say that there's a variety of opinion on which of those options is Elsevier's goal? I don't own my workplace, but I sure do have an interest in its success. Cheers, Elizabeth E. Kirk Associate Librarian for Information Resources Dartmouth College Hanover, NH, USA 03753 elizabeth.e.kirk@dartmouth.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Seven ARL Libraries Face Major Planned or Potential Budget Cuts
- Next by Date: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Previous by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Next by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Index(es):