[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Merck published fake journal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Merck published fake journal
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:00:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Are all these "fake" journals? I just want to be sure what we are talking about. Is any of the content of the articles false or fake? That would be pretty amazing. Not disclosing a sponsor is not good either, of course, and if it's six instances of this and not just one, it can't be the work of one rogue staff member. Six instances, if true, is a deliberate corporate decision. Joe Esposito -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Martha Brogan Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 4:50 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Merck published fake journal And then there were 6 per The Scientist on May 7th. Surely this warrants closer scrutiny. http://www.the-scientist.com/blog/display/55679/ Martha Brogan University of Pennsylvania Libraries
- Prev by Date: Re: Merck published fake journal
- Next by Date: Access to 2009 H1N1 Flu information
- Previous by thread: Re: Merck published fake journal
- Next by thread: Re: Merck published fake journal
- Index(es):