[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- From: "Ari Belenkiy" <belenka@mail.biu.ac.il>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:22:54 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> There is enough evidence that OA increases sales: > http://delicious.com/Klausgraf/monograph_open_access > > Klaus Graf > > 2009/5/1 Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>: > >> How does one even begin to measure the "economic value" of OA >> for, say, a work of literary criticism or a monograph on >> Hume's philosophy? We scholarly publishers would dearly like >> to believe that spreading our specialized content freely >> worldwide would be a benefit to civilization, but this is an >> article of faith for us, not something we have any easy way of >> quantifying economically. Right, it is clear that OA is a problem with the latest research in Medicine and must be restricted to it. Talking about necessity of OA in other fields is just nonsense. Am I right? Ari Belenkiy Bar-Ilan University
- Prev by Date: Re: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- Next by Date: RE: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- Previous by thread: Re: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- Next by thread: RE: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- Index(es):