[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- From: Stevan Harnad <amsciforum@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:24:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Journal articles that are OA, as a percentage of annual journal articles published is of course not the same as the percentage of annual journal articles that are published in OA journals (Gold OA). There's also the percentage of annual journal articles that are published in non-OA journals but made OA through author self-archiving (Green OA). The latter percentage is about 15% and growing, especially because Green OA self-archiving can be, and is being, mandated by their authors' institutions and funders. Stevan Harnad http://informationr.net/ir/14-1/paper391.html http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/ On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:33 PM, <Toby.GREEN@oecd.org> wrote: > A dramatic growth in OA journal titles is one thing, but surely > what counts is the number of OA articles as a percentage of all > articles. Last week at UKSG, Derk Haank of Springer estimated > that about 5-7% of newly published articles were OA today and he > expected growth to be modest. He also reckoned that OA's share of > all newly published articles would stabilize at about 10%. Does > anyone have any figures on the share of OA articles as a > percentage of all articles to corroborate or challenge Derk's > estimates? > > Toby Green > OECD
- Prev by Date: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Next by Date: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Previous by thread: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Next by thread: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Index(es):