[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Multi-Site licensing language
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Multi-Site licensing language
- From: "Pennington, Buddy D." <penningtonb@umkc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 19:23:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We do the same. Even though we have a separate health sciences campus for the schools of medicine, nursing and pharmacy, we take pains to explain to publishers that both sites share a single IP range, are factored into the total FTE, and share the same Chancellor and Provost. We've been successful in making this case every time except for a very recent incident (and I'll say we did not order the product). If the access is based on an IP range and the price is based on FTE or size of the institution it makes no sense to then charge more if those FTE are split up geographically. Buddy Pennington Serial Acquisitions Librarian University of Missouri - Kansas City 800 East 51st Street Kansas City, MO 64110 Phone: 816-235-1548 Fax: 816-333-5584 Email: penningtonb@umkc.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Emmet, Joan Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 9:38 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Multi-Site licensing language Georgie, I push hard against "multi-site" licensing all together. When licenses take into account all of the FTE of an institution or whatever means of pricing, it should be institutionally based rather than geographically. I define an institution by its IP ranges, which is more accurate as affiliated users could be anywhere and as long as they can connect to the secure network of the institution, there is absolutely no reason to consider the geographical location of the institution. I would encourage everyone to adopt this understanding. Site simply isn't relevant in the world of electronic access from anywhere on the globe. Joan Emmet Program Support Librarian, NERL Consortium PH: 203.432.2897 | FX: 203.432.7231 joan.emmet@yale.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Georgie Donovan Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 12:08 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Multi-Site licensing language Hi all, Does someone have a clear-cut definition for when a campus becomes a multi-site, triggering multi-site pricing & licensing requirements? Our school has a strong distance ed program, but has recently begun talking about whether to station permanent staff/faculty at community colleges or other local schools where we teach these satellite classes. My thinking is that once there is a permanent full-time staff/faculty person there, it may define us as campus with more than one site. Or would the tipping point come later, when there's truly a branded Appalachian State University - Hickory (or some such)? You may backchannel me directly (donovangl@appstate.edu) or write to the list. Thanks much, Georgie ---- Georgie Donovan, Asst. Professor Lead Acquisitions Librarian Belk Library - Appalachian State University w - 828.262.7571
- Prev by Date: RE: Multi-Site licensing language
- Next by Date: RE: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Previous by thread: RE: Multi-Site licensing language
- Next by thread: Re: Multi-Site licensing language
- Index(es):