[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:12:22 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
No, Sally is correct. You can license data-mining rights. It doesn't have to be open access. I am not suggesting that this is a good business practice, but Sally is correct in principle. Joe Esposito -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Klaus Graf Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:10 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy 2009/3/27 Sally Morris (Morris Associates) <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>: > Heather, you have missed one point that I tried to make quite > carefully. 'Free to Reuse' is NOT what is needed for text mining, etc > - in fact such content doesn't even need to be free to access. This is wrong, see e.g. http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/ Klaus Graf
- Next by Date: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- Next by thread: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- Index(es):