[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- From: Jan Velterop <velteropvonleyden@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:31:49 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ken Coates's piece is not even called Information Overload, but Knowledge Overload. This view of information and knowledge being an overload, a burden, one encounters often. But knowledge overload is a bit of a difficult notion for me. Though I do see the problem of being able to deal with all the information and knowledge that comes at us. Instead of seeing the increasing amounts of knowledge available as a problem, we should start seeing it as a serious opportunity. If not, we should simply stop acquiring knowledge. Nobody in his or her right mind would argue for that. But stopping to publish knowledge that has been acquired is equally absurd. But of course the tools to be able to navigate the ocean of knowledge need to be built. That's one of the tasks we hope the Concept Web Alliance and its members can take on. More on the Concept Web Alliance here: http:// conceptweblog.wordpress.com/ Jan Velterop On 23 Mar 2009, at 23:21, Joseph Esposito wrote: > See Ken Coates's piece in "Inside HigherEd":] > > http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/03/23/coates#Comments > > The title is "Knowledge Overload." > > My question, which I have been asking for 5 years now, is, Why does > anybody > believe that access is the key problem? > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- Next by Date: RE: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- Previous by thread: RE: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- Next by thread: RE: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- Index(es):