[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Grimmelmann on Google Book Settlement
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Grimmelmann on Google Book Settlement
- From: richards1000@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:53:51 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Listmembers may be interested in a new article on the Google Book settlement by Professor James Grimmelmann of New York Law School, who was a panel member at the March 13 Columbia Law School Google Book conference. See James Grimmelmann, "How to Fix the Google Search Settlement," Journal of Internet Law, Apr. 2009, at 1, http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=james_grimmelmann The article suggests some of the ideas that the library associations might advocate in their brief to the court, and in possible submissions to the Justice Department and the FTC. Here is a summary of Prof. Grimmelmann's article: Professor Grimmelmann recommends in his new article that the proposed Google Book settlement agreement be modified before court approval, and that the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission regulate the resulting transaction. Grimmelmann recommends approval of the settlement agreement, but only after several modifications. These include: *striking the "most favored nation" clause (section 3.8(a) of the settlement agreement, available at http://books.google.com/booksrightsholders/ ) that protects Google's competitive position respecting orphan works; *requiring the Book Rights Registry to offer future copyright holders the same terms as provided under the settlement; *mandating library and reader representation on the registry's board; *expressly authorizing the registry to negotiate with Google's competitors in the digitization market; *prohibiting Google from engaging in retail price discrimination respecting digital books; *incorporating express protections of reader privacy; and *requiring free public access to the registry's database of information respecting ownership of rights in the digitized books, and to Google's database recording which digitized books are available in print. Grimmelmann also calls for imposition of an antitrust consent decree on the registry and a grant of authority to the Justice Department to monitor all registry contracts for potential anticompetitive effect. Further, he recommends that the FTC regulate Google to prevent price discrimination, privacy breaches, and the imposition of onerous usage restrictions. Hat tip to Chris Welch: http://twitter.com/guppywon/statuses/1323802213 . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Robert C. Richards, Jr., J.D.*, M.S.L.I.S., M.A. Law Librarian & Legal Information Consultant Philadelphia, PA richards1000@comcast.net Legal Information Systems & Legal Informatics Resources: http://home.comcast.net/~richards1000/LegalInformationSystemsBibliography.htm Bankruptcy Research Guide: http://home.comcast.net/~richards1000/CostEffectiveBankruptcyResearch.htm * Member New York bar, retired status. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Prev by Date: 2nd International PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference: Preliminary Program Available
- Next by Date: RE: "Accepted Manuscript"
- Previous by thread: 2nd International PKP Scholarly Publishing Conference: Preliminary Program Available
- Next by thread: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- Index(es):