[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Purchase on Demand
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Purchase on Demand
- From: "Nawin Gupta" <nawin.gupta@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:32:53 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Purchase on Demand has been gaining in the journals market for some time. Libraries often weigh costs associated with a journal subscription against usage/demand for the journal, considering what it may cost to purchase a few articles patrons may request when needed. For journals that offer open access after a period of time, the economics become more favorable for Purchase on Demand. In the case of books, Joe's observations gain even more relevance as one considers movement to ebooks with accompanying gratification of instant delivery with Purchase on Demand. In addition to declining sales, might this also lead to disintermediation of the bookseller? Journals markets (and the subscription agents) have been experiencing this for some years. Nawin Gupta -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 4:33 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Purchase on Demand I have just posted a piece on the Publishing Frontier blog (http://pubfrontier.com) on the evolution of new purchasing patterns in libraries. It's called "Purchase on Demand." I would be very interested in getting feedback from the members of this list. Thank you. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: SPARC releases videos on digital repository development, Announces 2010 meeting
- Next by Date: Annual Reviews Announces Pricing Freeze for 2010
- Previous by thread: Purchase on Demand
- Next by thread: New guidance and insight from the UKSG: Latest chapters of The E-Resources Management Handbook
- Index(es):