[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Pirates vs. University Presses
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Pirates vs. University Presses
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:39:42 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I am not sure I understand this post. Are you suggesting that different laws should apply to different species of intellectual property, one set of rules for entertainment (Harry Potter), another set for academic research? Joe Esposito -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Klaus Graf Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:43 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses It is the same crime to spread knowledge by illegally making university press books available as to offer Harry Potter for download? Klaus Graf 2009/2/18 B.G. Sloan <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>: >>From "Inside Higher Ed": > > "It's not exactly news that the Internet is a perfect tool for > violating copyright. In book publishing, the big concern has been best > sellers that can be scanned and uploaded, with the idea that there is > a worldwide audience for the latest Harry Potter installment or Oprah > recommendation. While most university press books don't have quite > that commercial appeal, they are finding that they can still be the > targets of pirates." > > http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/02/18/pirate > > Bernie Sloan > Sora Associates > Bloomington, IN
- Prev by Date: RE: NIH issues
- Next by Date: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- Previous by thread: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- Next by thread: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- Index(es):