[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:08:10 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Google is NOT expected to determine the copyright status of millions of books. Google is expected not to digitize them without permission. Joe Esposito -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of David Prosser Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 3:01 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement I find it amusing that Google is expected to determine the copyright status of millions of titles before they can be digitised, but it is apparently unreasonable to expect publishers to determine the copyright status of the titles they publish themselves! David Prosser SPARC -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sandy Thatcher Sent: 30 January 2009 04:09 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement At 12:21 AM -0500 1/29/09, Rick Anderson wrote: >> There is, alas, a very significant amount of labor involved >> for publishers to investigate what digital rights they have in >> the books Google has digitized and to negotiate with authors >> over display and other types of rights they share under the >> settlement. This is hardly just a "free ride" for publishers. > >True -- it's essentially a free ride for the general public, but not >for publishers. However, my understanding (which may be flawed) is >that publishers who choose not to participate can withdraw their books >from the program very easily, and therefore end up no worse off than >they were before the project. I'm not sure how easy it is for a publisher to withdraw books. The publisher first has to identify which books in the database it can claim to own. And even identifying which books the publisher has published may not be so simple a task, especially for ones published before ISBNs came into use in 1970. All the books published between 1923 and that date have to be searched by means other than ISBNs. ***
- Prev by Date: RE: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- Next by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Previous by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Index(es):