[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- From: richards1000@comcast.net
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:00:00 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Thanks to Rick, Joe, and Sandy for highlighting the information costs for rights holders of participating in the Google settlement. I want to underscore the role of the Book Rights Registry respecting these costs. The rights holders can use the registry database to record all of the data necessary for making decisions respecting their rights in this first transaction. Because the registry can function as a rights organization, the rights holders can then use the registry to make quick and efficient licensing decisions in subsequent digitization transactions, such as those with Google's competitors. Although the rights holders are incurring very high information costs in this initial transaction, those costs can be amortized over many subsequent transactions. I think this demonstrates how the registry, functioning as a rights organization, can reduce information and transaction costs in this market, thereby lowering barriers to entry. This should encourage Google's rivals to enter the market for digitizing in-copyright and out-of-print books, increasing competition and benefiting consumers. Robert Richards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Robert C. Richards, Jr., J.D.*, M.S.L.I.S., M.A. Philadelphia, PA richards1000@comcast.net * Member New York bar, retired status. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Prev by Date: Report on Google Book Search discussion at ALA Midwinter
- Next by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Previous by thread: Report on Google Book Search discussion at ALA Midwinter
- Next by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Index(es):