[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- From: "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:15:41 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Chuck Hamaker said: "This section alone makes this a license that my library cannot agree to at all. Venue as, OCLC should know if they'd talked with many member libraries, is non-negotiable for many state institutions." Isn't this covered by the clause "except...as otherwise required by applicable law"?? Bernie Sloan Sora Associates Boomington, IN
- Prev by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by Date: Online resources on licensing
- Previous by thread: RE: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- Next by thread: RE: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- Index(es):