[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:09:28 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At 12:21 AM -0500 1/29/09, Rick Anderson wrote:
> There is, alas, a verysignificant amount of labor involved for publishers to investigate what digital rights they have in the books Google has digitized and to negotiate with authors over display and other types of rights they share under the settlement. This is hardly just a "free ride" for publishers.True -- it's essentially a free ride for the general public, but not for publishers. However, my understanding (which may be flawed) is that publishers who choose not to participate can withdraw their books from the program very easily, and therefore end up no worse off than they were before the project.
I'm not sure how easy it is for a publisher to withdraw books. The publisher first has to identify which books in the database it can claim to own. And even identifying which books the publisher has published may not be so simple a task, especially for ones published before ISBNs came into use in 1970. All the books published between 1923 and that date have to be searched by means other than ISBNs.
- Prev by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Previous by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Index(es):