[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:25:06 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Darnton's long piece includes this statement: "University presses, which depend on sales to libraries, cannot cover their costs by publishing monographs." This is not expressed with precision. For the past 3 months I have been conducting a survey of university presses. Among the questions I have been asking is, What percentage of a press's sales go to academic libraries? The answer appears to be 25%, though many press directors have told me that they would be more comfortable expressing this as a range: 15-25%. These figures are for dollars, not units. Unit sales would comprise a smaller percentage since libraries often purchase higher-priced editions than indiviuals. Libraries are important to university presses, but it is overstating the case to say that they "depend on" libraries. Amazon, which distributes books to a wide range of customers, including libraries, also comprises about 25% of university press sales. The reason it is not easy to get specific figures is that presses typically do not sell books directly to libraries but use various intermediaries (Baker & Taylor, Blackwell, Ingram, even Amazon), and is not always possible to find out from the intermediaries where the books eventually end up. It is certain that libraries at one time comprised a larger proportion of unversity press sales, though how large is a matter of debate. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by Date: Re: Duke University Press to Archive e-Books with Portico
- Previous by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Index(es):