[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rick.anderson@utah.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:20:59 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> When he or she uses Google and is presented with > advertisements, is that a good deal? It's an excellent deal, in part because one is presented with advertisements much differently than is the case on many other commercial sites. With Google, you only have to deal with the ads if you choose to; advertising links are segregated on the screen, and they don't command any attention that you don't choose to give them. This means that, in fact, Google charges nothing to end users, even in terms of attention. (Except, of course, for the opportunity cost of the time spent using Google. But that just means it "costs" something to use Google in the same sense that it costs something to take a nap, or to write a paper, or to think.) Rick Anderson Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections Marriott Library University of Utah rick.anderson@utah.edu
- Prev by Date: Article by Scott McLemee
- Next by Date: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Previous by thread: Re: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- Next by thread: Open Access: No Benefit for Poor Scientists
- Index(es):