[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- To: "'liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu'" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- From: Mike Poulin <mpoulin@mail.colgate.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:20:30 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Unfortunately, I am not attending midwinter as this would be a timely topic to hear views from both vendors and librarians. As we moved towards more "online only" titles, the issue of perpetual access has become more important in our roles as stewards of the institution's investment. As a result - we instituted a change in our collection development policy which addressed the issue directly and which basically states we will generally stay with print or print + online when we have no good archiving system in place. We are a pretty small school in terms of staff so that has meant outsourcing the archive by subscribing to Portico since we have no staff time to maintain a LOCCKS system. This year we moved over 200 subscriptions to online only for those publishers offering post-cancellation rights via Portico. For a few major publishers (Springer for example) who do not offer post-cancellation rights - we have retain print only. As our print use continues to diminish - those titles will likely become targets for cancellation. With that as background and in the current budgetary condition where many of us will have to make hard choices about reducing lesser used titles - it seems that perpetual access is only worth anything if it includes post-cancellation rights and if guaranteed by having a copy in print, from a third party such as Portico, or if you can do it yourself with LOCCKS. One cannot predict the changes in publishing industry - merges, changes in policies, etc. - so without an independent provider for the content you have very little to fall back upon. I would have liked to hear discussion about this topic. It would be interesting to hear from publishers who do not provide post-cancellation rights via a third party if they believe that it will affect their ability to compete for those scarce library subscription dollars. For what it is worth. Mike --------------------------------------- Mike Poulin Digital Resources Librarian & Coordinator of Digital Initiatives Colgate University Libraries 13 Oak Drive Hamilton, NY 13346 315-228-7025 fax: 315-228-7934 mpoulin@mail.colgate.edu --------------------
- Prev by Date: Re: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- Next by Date: Bad Times are Good Times for Open Access?
- Previous by thread: Re: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- Next by thread: RE: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- Index(es):