[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- From: "Aline Soules" <aline.soules@csueastbay.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:44:19 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This is perhaps expressed more harshly than I would have expressed it, but I definitely think Google is a "frenemy." This is a word used by Martin Sorrell, CEO of the WPP Group, one of the world's largest communications services groups, according to an article by Ken Auletta ("The Search Party", New Yorker 83, no. 43, Jan. 14, 2008, p. 32.). In that article, Sorrell "claimed that his company is Google's largest advertising-agency customer," so I feel confident in his knowledge of Google, at least from that perspective. Essentially, therefore, I agree with Siva. aline soules cal state east bay aline.soules@csueastbay.edu ________________________________ From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of B.G. Sloan Sent: Wed 1/14/2009 1:17 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search Last week I ran across some intriguing comments by Siva Vaidhyanathan. In his initial analysis of the Google settlement with publishers and authors, Vaidhyanathan briefly discusses the role of the library partners in Google Book Search. The following excerpt offers an interesting perspective from a non-librarian: "My major criticisms of Google Book Seach (sic) have always concerned the actions of the university libraries that have participated in this program rather than Google itself...Libraries at public universities all over this country...have spent many billions of dollars collecting these books. Now they are just giving away access to one company that is cornering the market on on-line access. They did this without concern for user confidentiality, preservation, image quality, search prowess, metadata standards, or long-term sustainability. They chose the expedient way rather than the best way to build and extend their collections...I am sympathetic to the claim that something is better than nothing and sooner is better than later. But sympathy remains mere sympathy...we must reflect on how complicit some universities have been in centralizing and commercializing knowledge under a single corporate umbrella." Just wondering what librarians might think about Vaidhyanathan's concerns? The full discussion (with reader comments) is at: http://tinyurl.com/678e5l Bernie Sloan Sora Associates Bloomington, IN
- Prev by Date: "Giveaways" and "corners" (RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search)
- Next by Date: Information resource about the Google Book settlement
- Previous by thread: RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- Next by thread: RE: Libraries criticized for role in Google Book Search
- Index(es):