[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit Mandates
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit Mandates
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:21:51 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Regarding Joe Esposito's question about whether digital archives can siphon usage from the publisher, we reported on such a find with 4 math journals in which some articles were deposited in the arXiv. see: Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Philip M. Davis, Michael J. Fromerth; Scientometrics Vol. 71, No. 2. p.203-215 (May, 2007) and to illustrate "the Google effect", here is a link to a free copy of the final manuscript: http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0603/0603056.pdf --Phil Davis Joseph J. Esposito asked: > Someone speculated to me that the availability of articles in IRs > is resulting in readers going to the IR version instead of the > subscription version, even when the reader has access to the > subscribed version (the cost of which is invisible to the > end-user). This was characterized to me as "a Google effect," > that is, someone does a search on Google and clicks on the IR > link rather than going to the library's subscription.
- Prev by Date: Re: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- Next by Date: Re: ALA Panel on Perpetual Access - seeking input
- Previous by thread: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit Mandates
- Next by thread: Re: STM Publisher Briefing on Institution Repository Deposit Mandates
- Index(es):