[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Olivia Judson
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Olivia Judson
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 22:48:52 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't believe I have ever even hinted that these things are easy to change. I have said quite the opposite: that the demands on information system design are growing and will continue to grow, making a number of services in existence today (including some that are beloved) obsolete. Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Law" <jamesblaw@gmail.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 4:39 PM Subject: Re: Olivia Judson > On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Joseph J. Esposito > <espositoj@gmail.com>wrote: > >>But, Bernie, the researcher shouldn't have to do this. > > Perhaps, if we were in a world where reasearchers are the ideal, or even a > customer. > >> The system should do it. > > The system offering the file gives the file a perfectly > understandable name - to that system. What is the incentive to > name it something else? > >> The mark of a well-designed car is that the owner/driver never, >> ever opens the hood. > > Car manufacturing would seem to be a broken system at the moment. > Aside from that, most recent cars are not user servicable, even > though the hood gives the appearance of opening. > > My intention is not to be snarky. I have a problem with this idea > that these problems are easily solved and that there are clear > parties at fault. The evidence is that it is a tangled mess, with > few incentives to change, many dis-incentives to change, and > groups such as researchers who rely on outputs they have no > control over. > > Jim Law > LiquidPub Project > <http://project.liquidpub.org/> > > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com> >> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> >> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 12:37 PM >> Subject: Re: Olivia Judson >> >>> Olivia Judson's 12/16 NY Times blog seems rather uninformed. >>> Her big gripe seems to be the naming conventions used for PDF >>> files: >>> >>> "The journal articles arrive with file names like 456330a.pdf >>> or sd-article121.pdf. Keeping track of what these are, what I >>> have, where I've put them, which other papers are related to >>> them, is hopeless. Attempting to replicate my old way of doing >>> things, but on my computer - so, electronic versions of papers >>> in electronic folders - didn't work, I think because I couldn't >>> see what the papers actually were." >>> >>> As a number of commenters on her blog pointed out, she easily >>> could have renamed the PDF files as she downloaded them so that >>> the file names indicated author/title information. This would >>> have solved her problem of not knowing "what the papers >>> actually were". >>> >>> For someone with such great intellectual/scientific curiosity, >>> Judson seems surprisingly unimaginative when it comes to >>> scholarly communication. >>> >>> Bernie Sloan >>> Sora Associates >>> Bloomington, IN
- Prev by Date: Version 74, Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography
- Next by Date: Stanford and HighWire's Mike Keller named AAAS Fellow
- Previous by thread: RE: Olivia Judson
- Next by thread: RE: Olivia Judson
- Index(es):