[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How many (peer reveiwed) journals are there?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: How many (peer reveiwed) journals are there?
- From: "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 17:26:07 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
For starters, who is the arbiter of what is and isn't a peer-reviewed journal? Can we agree on one source of data so that we aren't comparing apples to oranges? And once we agree on a source, how accurate is it? A lot of people (or at least a lot of librarians) use Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, which categorizes various journal titles. A title can be "scholarly" and/or "peer-reviewed". But that's not always accurate. For example, for years Ulrich's listed Library Journal as both scholarly and peer-reviewed, which most librarians know is not the case. Ulrich's only recently reclassified LJ as being not peer-reviewed and not scholarly. Bernie Sloan Sora Associates Bloomington, IN
- Prev by Date: Re: Authors, publishers, settle suit with Google
- Next by Date: CALIBER 2009 (Call for Paper)
- Previous by thread: How many (peer reveiwed) journals are there?
- Next by thread: Re: How many (peer reveiwed) journals are there?
- Index(es):