[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Liblicense-l: rules of the road
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Liblicense-l: rules of the road
- From: "Okerson, Ann" <ann.okerson@yale.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 19:14:36 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Readers: A couple of individuals have asked if liblicense-l has any "rules of the road" for moderation. I've tried to set them down, and here they are. Comments? Thank you, Ann ___ liblicense-l: Rules of the Road The hallmark of liblicense-l for many years has been its mix of current information of high value to librarians and publishers and friends, with serious and spirited discussion of issues that engage, perplex, and divide us. The moderator participates but hopes that the moderating hand is mainly invisible. But even if invisible, it is still active, seeking to keep the list valuable as a place for both information and discussion. First rule: If we can possibly post a submitted message, it will be posted, as soon as possible (usually this happens in the evenings), timing adjusted perhaps by professional travel and responsibilities, quirky networks, and the occasional balky laptop. We're not fond of censors and have no ambition to take on that role. Second rule: Tedium is tedious, so if there's a choice, messages are preferred to be shorter rather than longer. Once in a while if a message seems too long to sustain attention or promote conversation, we will ask the poster to shorten or perhaps point to a URL for fuller discussion. Third rule: Embarrassment is embarrassing and unpleasantness is unpleasant. If threads linger to the point where the posters lose perspective and the signal to noise ratio falls near zero, we will stop a conversation discreetly, perhaps by a note, as kindly as possible, to one or two posters. Fourth rule: Insults are unnecessary, so we try to ask posters to restate something if only heat and not light will result. (We do sometimes occasionally miss a potential source of affront, and apologies for that.) This does mean recognizing the personalities and styles of the regular posters, in particular, and not thwarting their evident pleasure in thwacking away at each other a bit with cushiony oversize boxing mitts. A bit of that may liven things up. Fifth rule: Nobody makes money here. Publisher announcements are posted when they seem to be of genuine interest to the readers here - e.g., announcing a very important piece of business, a new kind of partnership, a business model, or an ambitious project. Single announcements of individual new titles or new hires rarely meet that test of interest. Sixth rule: We all agree we dislike monopolies, so when there is risk of a poster monopolizing the conversation, we write to that person to ask for some restraint. Seventh rule: The Web is an even more wondrous place when we check URLs first to be sure they're working. Even then, the URL doesn't always work, though. Eighth rule: Vanilla ASCII "RULES." Sometimes evenings are spent reformatting, word by word, messages that, unfortunately, don't arrive as plain text -- provided such messages are readable at the moderator end; often they are not and must be returned to the sender. The Listproc software garbles non-ASCII text, html formatting, or attachments to some extent or totally, which means that it is a kindness to the moderator when posters send ASCII-only. (No "smart quotes", no em-dashes or en-dashes, no umlauts or accents.) Why use listproc? Because many of our subscribers are in countries where internet access doesn't permit easy receipt of fancy or complicated messages. Sometimes, character by character cleanup (not fun, believe me) doesn't work and gibberished messages go get to the list, so we go back to the archive to clean up the =20 and =93 signs that have crept in. That's not fun, either, but we do it. Ninth rule: Do all the previous message in the thread need to be included with your response? Often, the answer is NO. It's a different kindness to readers when posters (or the moderator) cut out some of the repetition that occurs when a thread goes on and mailers append sixteen earlier messages (with all their signature blocks!) to the new one that reads in full, "I agree with what Smedley wrote." Tenth rule: What happens on liblicense-l stays in the liblicense-l archive, which is linked off the LIBLICENSE web site (www.library.yale.edu/~llicense). We have only taken 3 messages out of the archive in 12 years, when pressed for legal reasons, and none for other requests. Eleventh rule: The "lib" in liblicense-l is pronounced with a long "I" as in "library." Twelfth rule: The above rules may be modified on occasion! Thank you for your interest, help, and support. ****
- Prev by Date: Review process of SJI
- Next by Date: Re: Emerald speeds up publication with EarlyCite
- Previous by thread: Review process of SJI
- Next by thread: Job Announcement: Senior Metadata Librarian
- Index(es):