[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wiley-Blackwell 2009 Subscription and Licensing Options
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Wiley-Blackwell 2009 Subscription and Licensing Options
- From: David Prosser <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:47:33 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Joe,there is nothing misleading in saying that these papers are being made OA to encourage wider readership. No matter how many times you write it it doesn't make it so. The ultimate motive of the wider readership may be marketing and the encouragement of greater subscriptions (I didn't make any claims regarding this), but it's wider readership nevertheless. David Joe Esposito in liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu writes: > Once again David Prosser writes a misleading post. > > Publications are not using OA to encourage wider readership. > They are using the equity of their branded publications, which > are almost in every instance (PLOS is the leading exception) > traditional in their economics, to promote certain ideas and > articles. This is called marketing. The form it takes is > product sampling. The articles being released without charge are > intended to lead readers back to the originating publisher. OA > has nothing to do with it. I suppose when John D. Rockefeller > handed out dimes to children, some people thought he was giving > away his fortune. > > Joe Esposito > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Prosser" <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk> > To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 4:42 PM > Subject: RE: Wiley-Blackwell 2009 Subscription and Licensing Options > >> Joe, really what am I misrepresenting? I said publications are >> making their papers open access to encourage wider readership. >> That's exactly what has happened. >> >> You make the trivial point that it is easier for a branded >> publication to attract attention than an unbranded publication. >> Very true. But that is not an OA issue, it's a branding issue. >> A new subscription-based journal from a new publisher will find >> it difficult to generate an audience. A new subscription-based >> journal from a well-known (branded) publisher might find it >> easier. Is it easier from a new OA journal to find an audience >> than a new subscription journal, all other things being equal? >> That is an interesting question, but not the issue I was >> addressing. >> >> Best wishes >> >> David Prosser >> Director, SPARC Europe
- Prev by Date: OPI: Bush and Congress Create an IP Czar Role
- Next by Date: Re: R: Revoked Open Access?
- Previous by thread: Re: Wiley-Blackwell 2009 Subscription and Licensing Options
- Next by thread: Re: Wiley-Blackwell 2009 Subscription and Licensing Options
- Index(es):