[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Publisher Constraints and the Version of Record

To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: Publisher Constraints and the Version of Record
From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:34:13 EDT
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

Here is the key assumption in Arthur Sale's posting:

Since the AM and the VoR differ in no essential respects (otherwise authors would be in arms), the citation advantage should trump prettiness.

If "prettiness" were indeed the only difference between the AM and VoR, do you really think publishers would be so generous about allowing the AM to be deposited in repositories? It just boggles my mind that discussions about OA keep making the assumption that copyediting does not occur or has no value.

Sandy Thatcher
Penn State University Press

Prev by Date: R: Revoked Open Access?
Next by Date: PLoS and SPARC release new "Voices of Open Access" video series
Previous by thread: Publisher Constraints and the Version of Record
Next by thread: LIBLICENSE-L: Moderated Message (fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread