[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Brisbane declaration on Open Access (fwd)
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Brisbane declaration on Open Access (fwd)
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:17:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
And, sadly, this Declaration seems to be based on the assumption that the only contribution publishers make is "formatting work." This is yet another sign that the role of copyediting is vastly underestimated. The world will be awash in poorly written and error-filled prose, I fear! Sandy Thatcher Penn State University Press >The Brisbane Declaration at last puts some real practical policy >content and substance into the Budapest/Bethesda/Berlin series. >Please read what the Archivangelist of the Antipodes, Arthur >Sale, one if its main architects, has to say about it. If this is >implemented planet-wide, we have universal Open Access within a >year. -- Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: RE: Revoked Open Access?
- Next by Date: R: Revoked Open Access?
- Previous by thread: Re: Brisbane declaration on Open Access (fwd)
- Next by thread: R: Revoked Open Access?
- Index(es):