[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- From: "Ian Russell" <ian.russell@cytherean.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:52:16 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Many publishers would agree that the results of publicly funded research should be available to the public free of charge but that these 'results' are the authors' original version of the manuscript before peer review, copy-editing, reference linking, typesetting etc. The authors' original version also does not benefit from association with a journal brand. If scholarship wants to benefit from the value added by publishers - whether those operating a predominantly gold OA business model, a predominantly subscription model or any other business model as yet not even though of, then it needs to be paid for. Taking away the ability for publishers to recover their investment and, yes, in some cases make a profit will only serve to stifle innovation and investment in scholarly communication and IMHO is not in the best interests of academia or of the public at large. Ian Russell ALPSP -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Linda Hopkins Sent: 20 September 2008 03:20 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding Dear All: I apologize for the emotionalism of my earlier comments. Whose rights to protect when it comes to scientific research is of course a complicated question. When I worked as a presidential advisor, the trend was definitely towards making access and practical use of knowledge developed by federal funds available to as many people as possible. I believe in that policy. I recognize that publishing houses want to make money on their publications and if Disney and Fox News want to do this, fine. That's entertainment. But the inherent value of scientific research is that a wide variety of learned experts read and discuss it. Since the purpose of federal funds for research is to advance science, technology, health care, and better standards of living, I believe that granting a free irrevocable, world-wide license to the government to display and copy articles is nothing more than fulfilling the purposes of the grant/contract. Linda Hopkins Linda K. Hopkins, Attorney at Law Intelliware Int'l Law Firm Roseville, MN 55113 Email: lin.hopkins@hotmail.com
- Prev by Date: Re: APS Announces Physics, A New, Free, Online Publication
- Next by Date: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
- Previous by thread: Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Next by thread: Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Index(es):