[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
- From: "atanu garai" <atanugarai.lists@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:54:52 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Stevan: 2008/9/17 Stevan Harnad <amsciforum@gmail.com> > Don't worry! That rare, lucky author will manage (and with a > smile on his face)... > > And once Deposit Mandates are universal, this is the sort of > thing that will help ensure the natural transition to universal > OA. It is indeed difficult to design and recommend systems that depend on individual decisions (such as actions and reactions by authors and users) such as this. This needs to be corroborated by empirical studies that authors are willing and give the users content as per their demand. As a matter of general practice this should be avoided because this kind of service provision can not be guaranteed by institutions managing large scale content, authors and users. It appears that the request button is designed to bypass the existing copyright laws but it does not take into account service delivery for the authors and users. Atanu Garai
- Prev by Date: Re: Copyright Review Management System - U of Michigan IMLS grant
- Next by Date: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
- Previous by thread: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
- Next by thread: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
- Index(es):