[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- From: "Mary Ann Jones" <MJONES2@mail.mcg.edu>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:53:30 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ann, The simple explanation is that this bill will not further protect the rights of authors; it will only protect the publishers who are behind the introduction of this bill. In fact, the NIH Public Access Policy does not require that an author transfer copyright to the government, only that the author deposit the final peer-reviewed article and grant a license to the government to distribute the article after 12 months. Let's not forget it is the publishing industry that routinely requires authors to transfer their copyright as a stipulation for publishing an article. Basically, this bill would prevent the government from doing the very thing that publishers routinely do to authors, so in essence the publishing lobby is not protecting authors, they are protecting themselves. Mary Ann Jones, MLIS Assistant Professor Electronic Resources Management Librarian Robert B. Greenblatt, M.D. Library Medical College of Georgia mjones2@mcg.edu
- Prev by Date: Announcing bepress 2009 prices and news
- Next by Date: RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Previous by thread: Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Next by thread: RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Index(es):