[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CQ Press Hosting Fee & Relationship to Existing License
- To: <ann.okerson@yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: CQ Press Hosting Fee & Relationship to Existing License
- From: "Hamaker, Charles" <cahamake@uncc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:58:08 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The current version of their license states CQ Press may periodically make changes to it and "post such changes on the Site and the changes will become effective immediately"... I don't know how to respond, as it seems to counter the purpose of a negotiated license. Chuck Hamaker -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Okerson, Ann Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:25 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: CQ Press Hosting Fee & Relationship to Existing License As readers may be aware, Sage Publishers bought CQ (Congressional Quarterly) Press back in early June. Our library recently received correspondence from CQ Press informing us that an annual hosting fee for perpetual-access backfiles was being introduced, in order to "support the highest quality standards for institutional access to our perpetual access resources." Though the requested fee is moderate, the introduction of this fee is contrary to the language in our existing license with CQ Press (dated October 2005), which, in the section on the "Perpetual Electronic Ownership Rights Option" (Section XIV), states that "Licensee shall be billed a one-time fee for the ownership option." (We are currently also paying an annual subscription fee for electronic access.) There is language to the effect that provisions shall survive any termination of this agreement. In any case, we checked with CQ Press and confirmed that the existing license remains in force. Does the publisher have a contractual obligation to us? Under what conditions might such an obligation be changed? We welcome your thoughts. Thank you, Ann Okerson/Yale Library
- Prev by Date: RE: Request for information on book purchasing
- Next by Date: MPS and PLoS Sign Agreement
- Previous by thread: CQ Press Hosting Fee & Relationship to Existing License
- Next by thread: MPS and PLoS Sign Agreement
- Index(es):