[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: selling e-articles
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: selling e-articles
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 23:46:42 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
For anyone who does not follow Barbara Fister's playful reference to the link on the BoingBoing blog, it may indeed appear that the Wal-Mart company is indeed making bizarre assertions about copyright. But follow the link; the blog post is by the talented science fiction writer but unreliable copyright authority Cory Doctorow. The "copyright is forever" comment is made by a Wal-Mart employee, not an authorized spokesperson for the company. This is demagoguery on Doctorow's part. No doubt you could find a librarian somewhere who would assert that a library could take an in-copyright book, scan it, and put it on an open Web server for all the world to access and call it fair use. But I doubt that that interpretation would accord with the institution's policy. I have no quarrel with Fister here, who provided me with a welcome early-morning chuckle. But Doctorow, sigh. Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barbara Fister" <fister@gac.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>; "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:33 PM Subject: Re: selling e-articles > Yes - the National Geographic case involved photography. Tasini > found in favor of the authors, though there's still some fallout > litigation going on; National Geographic was found in favor of > the NGS, because unlike Tasini it didn't disaggregate the photos > but reproduced the whole shebang on a CD. > http://www.nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2008/07/greenberg.html > > Though everything has been simplified: Wal-Mart has recently > ruled that "copyright is forever" - :o) > http://www.boingboing.net/2008/08/12/walmart-you-cant-sca.html > > Barbara Fister > > Quoting "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>: > >> Pippa Smart said: >> >> "The problem that your colleague was thinking of is Tasini, a >> case where the NYT took photographs that it had used in one >> publication, and then created a new database product without the >> permission of the photographers - the problem was the creation of >> a new product." >> >> Didn't the Tasini case involve freelance writers who claimed that >> publishers had violated their copyrights by placing their works >> in third party electronic databases without obtaining permission >> from the freelance writers? >> >> Bernie Sloan >> Sora Associates >> Bloomington, IN >
- Prev by Date: Re: The House of Cards
- Next by Date: Electronic Resources & Libraries 2009 - Call for Proposals
- Previous by thread: RE: selling e-articles
- Next by thread: [no subject]
- Index(es):