[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The House of Cards
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: The House of Cards
- From: "Jan Szczepanski" <Jan.Szczepanski@ub.gu.se>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:34:04 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I really share Joe Espositos view about the green future. It's a bleak one. But he forgets the golden road. Thousands of new free e-journals every year. 100% OA Commercial journals are out. More than 50% of new e-journals are free journals. It's really old fashioned with a price tag connected to important reading. Jan > Stevan Harnad wrote: > > But the trouble is that apart from astrophysics and high energy > physics, no other field has anywhere near 100% OA: It's closer > to 15% in other fields. So apart from a global correlation > (between the growth of OA and the average length of the > reference list), the effect of OA cannot be very deeply > analyzed in most fields yet. > > **** > > JE: Precisely: it's too soon to make any judgments. > Therefore, there is also no reason to conclude that there is an > "open access advantage." > > Professor Harnad, like other OA activists, is watching as the OA house of > cards collapses. The OA promise--more and better--is being replaced with > the reality. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: NISO Webinar on ONIX for Publications Licenses (ONIX-PL) -- Septem=
- Next by Date: Re: Multiple authors on OA articles in IR's
- Previous by thread: Re: The House of Cards
- Next by thread: Re: The House of Cards
- Index(es):