[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: article on aggregated databases
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: article on aggregated databases
- From: "Chen, Xiaotian" <chen@bumail.bradley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:52:56 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Three factors need to be considered when evaluating today's usage stats: 1. the role of OpenURL link resolver. It is possible that users start from a general aggregated full-text database, but do not use the full text from native database and use the link of OpenURL to get full text elsewhere. So OpenURL could cause "decreasing downloads." It can also help increase downloads, depending on the OpenURL settings. There are simply so many variables due to OpenURL. 2. the role of federated search engine. Obviously, it helps increase searches. 3. the quality of statistics provided by vendors. We seldom hear questioning on the quality of usage stats provided by vendors, because it is not as obvious as the holes in swiss cheese. But I noticed that sometimes we get lousy stats that either over-state or under-state the real number. One the one hand, I have had received reports about sucessful full-text downloads from titles that have never existed on the database. On the other hand, I have also received reports of a grand total smaller than a sub total---that is, vendor-reported search smaller than federated-search-reported search, with the former being grand total and the latter sub total. Nevertheless, that is a very interesting study and I will start to watch the differences between searches and downloads. Thank you. Xiaotian Chen Electronic Services Librarian Bradley University Peoria, Illinois 61625 http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~chen/index.html ________________________________ From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Barbara Fister Sent: Sat 7/26/2008 8:45 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: article on aggregated databases Interesting to see a drop at your place, too. But yeah, what's up with the searches? Are students becoming more selective about what they click on? Are they flailing around more, so throwing more terms at the databases while being dissatisfied with what comes back? It's all very puzzling. Barbara >Linda Wobbe wrote: > > At Saint Mary's College we have seen a similar trend: increasing > "searches" in article databases - decreasing "articles downloaded".
- Prev by Date: Further update about Wiley InterScience transition
- Next by Date: Strong growth in Hindawi's Impact Factors
- Previous by thread: Re: article on aggregated databases
- Next by thread: Vagaries of a licensed resource
- Index(es):