[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: article on aggregated databases
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: article on aggregated databases
- From: Linda Wobbe <lwobbe@stmarys-ca.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:59:56 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At Saint Mary's College we have seen a similar trend: increasing "searches" in article databases - decreasing "articles downloaded". The change happened as we began adding more fulltext Reference databases, which experienced a spike in downloading. So, one explanation was that students were using the Reference encyclopedias and handbooks appropriately for background information. Still, why more searches in the article databases? We also implemented OpenURL (as opposed to linking to holdings) at the same time, and our users seem very confused by the "results screen". (We have since implemented "one-click" which opens the fulltext article immediately if available; but we don't have final statistics to see if that stemmed the tide of decreasing "articles downloaded".) Finally, the bulk of our drop in "articles downloaded" was in one vendor's statistics. Perhaps the vendor changed how they counted downloads? Instituted longer embargoes? Lots of speculation here, and obviously room for more research.
Here are our stats 3 years running.
Periodical Databases:
Periodical database searches total for 2006-07 is 244,229, an increase
of 11% over the prior year.
Prior year total searches:
2005-06 ..220,103
2004-05 ..273,159
Periodical Database full text articles downloaded for 2006-07 was
78,945, a drop of 11%. Prior year totals:
2005-06 .. 88,533
2004-05 ..115,424
Linda Wobbe
Head, Collection Development & Periodicals
Science Subject Specialist
Saint Mary's College of California
Library
Moraga, CA 94575-4290
lwobbe@stmarys-ca.edu
____
Joseph J. Esposito wrote:
This is a very interesting article. Is the decline in article downloads being experienced everywhere? Are there additional explanations for this phenomenon? Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barbara Fister" <fister@gac.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 5:41 PM Subject: article on aggregated databasesApologies for cross-posting Some of you may be interested in an article about aggregated databases and undergraduates that we've just published in the July issue of portal: Libraries and the Academy, available to many of you through Project Muse. For those who don't have access, there's a self-archived copy here - http://homepages.gac.edu/~fister/aggregateddatabases.pdf The short version - --librarians are very satisfied with these database --vendors are listening to librarians and are including more content. --from 2005-2006 at 14 undergrad libraries, use declined 10% overall. --in all of those libraries combined, 40% of the full text journals included in the database did not have a single article downloaded - not one - at any of the libraries; 4% of titles accounted for half of the downloads. Of the top ten most downloaded publications, only two were scholarly. --we still have a lot of questions. Just thought you all might be interested. Barbara (and Amy Fry and Julie Gilbert, co-authors)
- Prev by Date: Cambridge to publish Journal of Financial and Qualitative Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: article on aggregated databases
- Previous by thread: Re: article on aggregated databases
- Next by thread: Re: article on aggregated databases
- Index(es):