[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Declan Butler on PLOS
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Declan Butler on PLOS
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 18:25:14 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Declan Butler's recent piece on the PLOS business model was cited on this list. I think Butler is attempting to hold PLOS to a standard that few publishers attain, including Butler's own employers at the Nature Publishing Group. What PLOS is doing (whether you like the practice or not) is simple brand extension. There are highly presitigious and selective PLOS publications, whose aura is being transferred to a new program, PLOS One, which has a different editorial methodology. We are all familiar with this; most members of this list work with Microsoft Windows, Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Word, and Microsoft Excel; renegades may own an iMac, iPod, and and iPhone. The Nature Publishing Group has been among the most aggressive STM publishers in extending its brand to new publications. Indeed, a rival of Nature wryly remarked to me (enviously, perhaps?) that Nature had put its name onto so many publications that he was awaiting the announcement for "Nature Nature." PLOS is not above criticism, but let's not insist that an OA service compete with toll-access publishers on what are truly spurious grounds. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Nature's Offer To "Let Us Archive It For You": Caveat Emptor
- Next by Date: Re: Google Book Search and fair use
- Previous by thread: Nature's Offer To "Let Us Archive It For You": Caveat Emptor
- Next by thread: "Open Textbooks"
- Index(es):