[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shameless plug
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Shameless plug
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 19:36:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Joseph J. Esposito wrote: > An article of mine was just published at > http://journalofelectronicpublishing.org. The title is "Open > Access 2.0." An earlier, abbreviated version of this essay > appeared in "The Scientist" in November; the JEP version is the > full piece. The abbreviated version was cited on this list. Nothing much seems to have changed in this new version. It still keeps misrepresenting Green OA self-archiving as if it were unrefereed self-publishing rather than the self-archiving of refereed journal articles. Wishing it were so does not make it so. The prior critiques of Joe's position continue to be valid -- and to be overlooked by Joe: See: Publishing Management Consultant: "Open Access Is Research Spam" OA As "Research Spam": II Putting Science Publishing Into Perspective No Such Thing As "Provostial Publishing": I http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?serendipity%5Baction%5D=search&serendipity%5BsearchTerm%5D=Esposito Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: Re: universities experiment with paying OA fees
- Next by Date: Richard Poynder Blog Posting about Costs of Open Access
- Previous by thread: Shameless plug
- Next by thread: RE: Shameless plug
- Index(es):